Burn all student debt

Is it just me, or do too many Baby Boomers seem to find immense enjoyment in making bloodsport out of punching down on the millennial generation? Recently, one of our most televised and broadcasted political pundits, Mike Hosking—who also happens to be a walking stereotype of a self-entitled Boomer—had something inane to say to students who skip the country to avoid paying back their staggering student debts:

student debt.PNG

You want to talk about “THEFT”?

Ok then, let’s talk about the intergenerational theft many of the Baby Boomer generation have committed against my generation. The Boomers, enjoyed free university education. Then, once a small handful of boomers, including PM John Key, were elected to power, they ripped the ladder up and forced the millennial generation to go into staggering amounts of student debt.

Increasingly, “higher education” is becoming more of a privilege of the super-rich than a human right for anyone else.  

You want students to stop skipping the country to avoid their staggering student loans? I can tell you as someone who has just turned 30, a loan feels more and more like a choke-chain around my neck, and the higher wages of lands like Australia and beyond seem increasingly enticing. Moving is entirely rational.

In Aotearoa New Zealand, we need to raise wages generally, and make our minimum wage market-leading. It would mean we would not have to skip New Zealand to avoid paying back loans for degrees that are now almost worthless in a stagnant and flooded job market full of overqualified and desperate graduates.

I have to ring the IRD monthly and beg for a “compassionate” extension for my student loan repayments ‘cos I earn so little, and my pay-check is so inconsistent because for my whole working life I have been subject to casual contracts. These contracts afford me zero job security and no promise of exact hours each week.  I also have to contend with the embarrassment of going over my finances with some IRD call centre worker each time I call.

Bare in mind, I barely make over 18k a year. But if I don’t ring them up and “beg”, the IRD will take 20% of my pay-check because when I ‘skipped’ the country to Australia, in a bid to earn a better wage, I did not pay back my loan for a year. Why not? Because I was trying to pay back the overdraft I took out when I couldn’t make rent for a few months when I was a student. When you come from a working-class family of limited means you’re often forced to go into debt because your parents can’t bail you out when your landlord hikes up the rent or unexpected bills come through.   

Graduates who were unable to secure a decent job with a liveable pay-check, which is a mass majority of us, are fighting over crappy, low-paid jobs we do not even want; I have been stuck working minimum wage jobs in the service industry for ten years now. I hold two undergraduates and two post graduates, including a secondary teaching degree. Primary teachers are now leaving the Auckland area because they cannot afford the rising living costs. Not to mention ‘permanent’ contracts are being rolled back in teaching work, and instead, yearly ‘fixed’ contracts are offered, so now you only have a guarantee of work for one year. Teacher’s wages do not increase in line with the Consumer Price Index, so you can imagine how hard it is to attempt to live on poverty wages in the service industry while trying to pay back tens of thousands worth of debt accumulated at university.

When lived in Australia, I made more money as a bartender pouring pints and making cocktails, than I would have done as a first year teacher in, New Zealand. Just let that sink in for a moment.

We are trying to survive in a ruthless job market where workers rights have been rolled back and undermined by money-hungry employers who care only for profit and not their workers. Our ability to pay off our student loans is directly related to what wages are on offer – this should be obvious;  you’d think it would go without saying. Job creation has ground to a halt as such workers are being pitted against each other, serving only to push wages down even further.

As if that wasn’t enough, the National government has agreed to the TPPA, a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) which will see the pitting of workers against each other  only get much, much more aggressive and humiliating. Famed linguist and author, Noam Chomsky, recently told HuffPost Live,

“[The TPP] is designed to carry forward the neoliberal project to maximize profit and domination and to set the working people in competition with one another, to lower wages and increase insecurity.”

In a flooded job market, as low-wage workers with loans to pay back, we become desperate and easily exploitable – more willing to accept fewer, or zero  benefits,  and grudgingly agree to sub-human wages. Why? Because we have no other option: there has been a massive rise in precarious work in Aotearoa. It’s a global trend, begun in the US and exported around the world that this precarious work develops where the use of zero hours and casual contracts becomes common. These types of contracts leave workers economically vulnerable because they guarantee no set hours of work. Holiday and sick pay is often denied to them.

And guess who is mostly being offered these types of contracts? New immigrants, people of colour, women and yes, YOUNG PEOPLE. There are very many of uswho are being collectively screwed.

When, so often, those who took on student debt are just struggling to stay above the poverty-line, how are we meant to pay back our student loans?

Last month I was at an Auckland University student rally against ongoing fee-rises that mostly result in women and Maori and Pacfika people being locked out of higher education. Politicians, academic staff and student representatives spoke. Marama Fox, co-leader of the Maori Party, urged students to take to the streets and fight for a better deal. I caught her at the end and asked, “What do you think it will take to incite the kind of political rage we need to stop rising fees?”

Marama responded: “You have to have champions. You have to have people that just go out and relentlessly gather others behind them. You need people who are religiously going ‘We are going to do it’ and plan an action, and then do it. You can never ever let this issue go off the agenda. You need champions.”

Despite being highly qualified workers, we find it easy to start to demand less. We speak out less. We keep quiet and shut up about workplace injustices like the fact that white women are paid 11.8% less than men, and women of colour even less. It has become crystal-clear to me that as a worker I am only worth the profit I can generate for my employer, reflected in the poor wages they pay me and the benefits they’ve routinely denied me. It doesn’t matter how hard I’ve grafted for an employer, or how ‘back-breaking time-flexible’ I have been, or how much I’ve smiled at rude and obnoxious customers, I have never, in ten years of working in the hospitality sector, received a pay-rise.

I can’t pay rent, let alone pay back my student loan.

Not once was I rewarded for my loyalty or commitment with a measly 50 cent pay-rise from my boss. The only pay rise I can rely on is the annual increase which this year was only 30 cents. Yeah, please tell me again how ‘hard work’ will one day pay-off? It doesn’t. Under neoliberalism and a broken economy which so many Boomers ripped holes in, to tell anyone ‘hard work’ pays off, is nothing more than pacifying lies.

Put Mike Hosking on minimum wage and subject him to a zero hour contract, then lump him with the dead weight of student debt in the tens of thousands with no real way of paying it back, and watch how quickly things begin to change.

All of this: low wages, a rise in precarious and often part-time work, coupled with student debt is compounded by brutal and ongoing welfare reforms and cuts to public spending, enacted first by Roger Douglas Minister of Finance for the Labour government in the late 1980s, have created the situation many of us are in today. In 1992, Ruth Richardson of the National government carried on Roger’s destructive work with what she called ‘The Mother of all Budgets’. Ruth, fondly nicknamed “Ruthinasia,” made significant cuts to welfare and also introduced student loans; prior to this university education had been free.

Predictably, she’d never had to pay back any student debt herself.

Fast forward to current day Aotearoa, and PM John Key’s National-led government has placed further sanctions on welfare, making it an unbearably humiliating process and almost impossible to access whether you need it because you are out of work, sick, disabled, or mentally unwell. It doesn’t matter. You will face impunity and callousness from Work and Income New Zealand (WINZ).

John Key, like Ruth, also introduced cuts to higher education via his capping of the student allowance; unless you come from a wealthy background, going on to a masters or a PHD becomes increasingly difficult. Placing barriers on access to education is a violation of a human being’s basic right to an education, and this includes higher education. One of the best ways to pull yourself out of poverty and access upward mobility is through education that is free and accessible, regardless of where you perch on the ladder of societal privilege.

When countries have a strong welfare system and social support nets, people, be they young or old, are not routinely forced to take any menial, demeaning job. It means they have more time to look for work that better suits their skills and education, and not just take anything because they are hungry and have bills to pay.

Yet, Mike Hosking thinks he has the right to publicly criminalise students by labelling them “thieves”, when they skip the country to avoid paying back crippling amounts of student debt? Which, ultimately, criminalises those from lower economic communities and families, who went looking for a ‘better life’ overseas. Mike, in all his white male privilege and arrogance, is very publicly perpetuating the War on the Poor.  

It was Mike Hosking’s own generation which benefited so greatly from free university education, only to then turn around and rip it… no, steal it, away from not only my generation and Boomers and Gen Xers who decided to study later on in life, but the generation coming up after me. This generation has been labelled “Generation K,” after the character Katniss from dark dystopian trilogy The Hunger Games. Katniss, a young girl, is forced to battle other young people from the lower socio-economic, working class districts in an annual televised death match, until only one is left alive. No wonder these books sold 64 million copies worldwide, and the series has become what Laurie Penny recently called the “defining mythos for this generation”; our world today acutely reflects that elitist and poverty stricken world described by Suzanne Collins, the author.

Journalist Laurie Penny, writes,

“Most teenagers I know spend a frightening amount of time reading dystopian fiction, when they are not half killing themselves trying to get into universities that they know are no longer a guarantee of employment.

As Millennials I think we owe it to Generation K and the generations after them –  who will not only suffer the worst effects of neoliberalism but the devastating effects of climate change also – to stand up to people like Mike Hosking. I think we owe it to Generation K and ourselves to tell Mike Hosking and those who push the same harmful and hurtful rhetoric just how disgusting and psychopathic we think their positions on the poor and disenfranchised of this country really are.

I believe, with all my heart, we owe it to the coming generations to take to the streets collectively again, like students are right now in America, to demand and fight for national student debt forgiveness and free education. On November 12th this year, more than 120 campuses across the US joined the first ever National Student March.  Organizer Elan Axelbank told US Uncut,

“This has been building since the global recession in 2008. There are tens of millions of low-wage jobs, the cost of tuition is going up, and the amount of state aid has gone down. It’s almost impossible to pay off student debt today.”

We have a responsibility as millennials in Aotearoa, to move in solidarity with Generation K and ignite a National Student March of our own which is globally connected. We also need to strategically connect a National Student March movement with other workers such as our public healthcare workers who are enacting rolling strikes in Auckland, to protest cuts to public health, and university staff in places such as AUT who are ‘working to rule’, and walking off the job to demand fair pay and a better deal. I believe in workers solidarity generation to generation.  There is strength in numbers.

As the picket slogan goes: “Workers, united, will never be defeated.”

 

10456029_10153605756646539_7019806803077665837_n.jpg

I, and my mum,  who is a Union organiser at Middlemore hospital, Auckland, and a mental health worker, at the healthcare  rallies, to demand ‘quality care everyday’ and better work conditions.

 

1508545_10153605756721539_1762698690936980561_n.jpg

Heathcare workers taking to the picket lines, at Middlemore Hospital, Auckland

The time has passed for asking nicely for what we want. How much more economic deprivation will it take until, finally, there is a tipping-point for young people in this country, and we fiercely and relentlessly stand up and become “champions ” for other people trapped by mounting student debt and low-paid, repetitive, depressing work? As far as I am concerned, revolt is the only option left.

We need to show intergenerational solidarity; we need to fight, not just for our own right to debt-free education, but more importantly, for the coming generations to have what we never did: access to free higher education.

You can follow me on twitter!

Do you want to support my writing? As a low income earner who is stuck in the service industry finding the time to write, can be hard. You can support me economically by becoming a ‘Patreon’ of my work. CLICK HERE for more details. 

9 Comments

  1. Fully agree Chloe. I am a semi retired teacher in my 70th year, and I have always seen as tragic the foolish changes our country made under Lange and Douglas, and as even more tragic the way that news media controlled by marketers have stifled informative dissent and made it all become the norm.

    Our society needs people like you – keep it up. Education always was a public good, but the money-changers drowned us out and declared it a private good. Hence student debt, which I see as theft from those who will benefit society most. Theft from the public good.
    Hosking is a shallow, ignorant rabbiter. But he has ‘charm’ and the blessing of the marketers who control our media.

    Like

    Reply

    1. Totally agree with Chloe. An university Education sadly is a big business nowadays. Even a Vice Chancellor who is largely or ideally drawn from academia but not from private industry is no longer the practice in some places, which is a shame as well as an insult to a higher academic institution. It is more like a super market.

      Like

      Reply

  2. I’m a boomer and I fully agree with your analysis of how we got here – in terms of indentured millennials – and how we might actively upend a system designed to sustain its inter-generationally patented unfairness. I am only surprised by how long it has taken for those laboring – in casual and underpaid work – to service such unsupportable debt to decide that enough is enough. See you in the streets.

    Like

    Reply

  3. Chloe – why don’t we start a national movement around abolishing student debt? I know there’s students and ex-students down here in Wellington who’d jump on board. Pala

    Like

    Reply

    1. yeah I agree we need to spark a movement. So much apathy has been created on University campuses because students are so busy wokring long hours to be able to afford rent and to learn. And the job market is so bleak and cut throat when you leave, I think students are just running scared half the time?

      Like

      Reply

  4. Education, Health & Shelter should be the responsibility of the Government of a country as those are basic needs of the people. Higher education needs to be free for everyone at least up to the first degree.The important question is why people leave? If they can find jobs at home, they will remain and pay their loans. Many graduates had been doing low paid, manual and menial work until they left for overseas and find suitable employments. NZ universities will have to import students in future for their survival, as these institutions are just business establishments not noble educational institutions. The sole purpose of giving student loans seems to help universities run and pay the teachers their wages. Both these would go bankrupt without students as home students are still the majority. So the money is just rolling from govt to uni. and back via students. It is important to consider the fact that NZ is not at the top of the priority list for international students either.So we cannot depend on International students alone.Also, we will be losing our younger generation, for they will leave the country to find opportunities elsewhere for education and work.

    Like

    Reply

  5. Please tell me why it needs to be free. It seems we have plenty of students for every college seat. Here in the US we actually are experiencing a shortage of college seats in some areas. The problem seems to be too many people going to college. Let me explain.

    We should be looking at what these colleges produce. Do their degrees have any value? Why are they offering degrees when they know there is totally no prospect of the student getting a job in that field. Why are students paying for useless degrees? Why are people suddenly surprised that when they graduate their chose field has a .05% employment rate.

    More people going to college wont fix this, and free college will not help at all. We need better college programs and degrees that actually help people get jobs.

    Like

    Reply

    1. It depends how you define value? If you just think the only usefulness people have is the capital they can turn over then I guess an arts degree would have no value to you. And if you want a world where culture has been destroyed, where only the very wealthy get to write plays, pen books, make art and music then, I am a bit lost for words because that sounds like a dystopia. I think everyone regardless, of their economic situation should be able to access higher education. And if they want to do a degree in visuals arts or whatever, they sould be able to.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

  6. How do I define value. I guess like most people, value is something that gives you a reasonable return on investment. That investment can be time, money, emotion, effort. We make value judgments every day, example I see no value is Starbucks. Not that the coffee is bad or I hate corporate coffee. I think I can make far better at home for a fraction of the cost. Therefor SB has bad value.

    Employers define it a adding something substantial to the company profit/mission. So if I can add substantially to my company I have or bring value. If I’m an easily replaceable/disposable I think I would bring little value. So what ever value you have as a person doesn’t matter for a job. It matters what you can produce.

    Now lets address your comments. You somehow claim I want culture destroyed. I confess, you caught me, I want to bulldoze the MMoA. You refuse to understand that an art degree for 95% of the people who get them are worthless. Getting that degree will not help you create great art. For some it will help them become better artists. For others it will help refine their talent. For the rest good luck getting a job.

    The very wealthy don’t write many books or make art or what ever. They are too busy making money. And they use that money to sponsor art. If you look at the patron list for the Met or MMoA it reads like a who’s who of the NYC elite. Art can’t survive without rich patrons. Granted many children of the rich go into the arts because their parents become their defacto patron.

    Ok, here’s a news flash. Economics (Money) allows us or prevents us for just about everything. I want a BMW, but can afford a Hyundai, wow that darn economics thing again. But this is the big thing, if that BMW is so important to you, you will find a way to get it. It may take 10 years, but you will get it. Education is no different. If I want Harvard but can only take a few classes at the local community college than that’s what you do. It may take you 10 years to get that degree, but you earned it. (FYI, I went part time to a small state school to get me degree).

    Not that visual arts thing. If that’s what you want fine. Go for it. Just go into it knowing your getting it for yourself because it wont get you a job. If you hold the degree as valuable to you, then it has value to you. Just don’t expect me to put any value in it as an employer.

    A few personal notes: I love art, music and literature. Which is why I believe all tecky majors need courses in the humanities. My humanities background has help me tremendously in the technology and military fields. But I acquired the hard skills to go with them. I love learning and education and love discovering new things.

    Personal observation on Chloe; You seem to think because something has value to you to should to everyone. It doesn’t work that way. And don’t expect an employer to value anything you do. You may be a wonderful person, feed orphans, what ever. If I’m hireling you I couldn’t care less. Make me money or get out. Perform or I’ll find someone who will.

    You also seem to think people are entitled to things, well their not. The world owes and gives us nothing but what we make ourselves. Yea its a cruel world, but it always has been.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment